I wondered why my laptop fan kicked in whenever I started the Adobe XD viewer. So I checked Task managter and found 9 processes! When I killed the processes another one, a crash recovery process started.
To top it of I got 3 processes for autostart, running whether I have started the XD viewer or not. Or maybe 6, depending on where you look and what you look for.
I have disabled 3 tasks in Task manager->Startup but whenever I start the machine there are 3 processes from Adobe running. So, through Sysinternals’ autoruns I find 6+2+5 autostarts and various settings. I have not delved into what is running processes and what “just another” setting.
As a viewer it is quite hefty.
As if the computer, Dell, with latest version of Windows, and Microsoft bloat ware was not enough…
I am running Windows10. I don’t know what the XD viewer looks like on MacOS.
In Adobe’s defence I have not measured the memory and cpu and power consumption impact. On the other hand I have not checked what else Adobe has done, like installing programs that are not so easily linked to adobe (svchost) or bogging down the machine in other ways (hard disk, changing order of processes in the network pipe) or what it does when it calls home.
One cannot point at a folder and just start, as we did with the full framework. There seems to be several solutions for Core and the one described here requires a publish. (Visual studio 2017:menu->Build->Publish)
Publishing a dotnet core site copies relevant parts to a folder
Until Microsoft implements change feed notifications for deletions we have to soft delete items in Cosmosdb if we use change feed notifications.
TL;DR
Cosmosdb has a handy feature where it journals changes which can then be read in another process. My use was for updating an Azure search index (Elastic search variant) whenever I made a change.
But… how do we handle deletions?
Hidden in the documentation is the information that ,,albeit all changes (within a shard) is guaranteed to be in chronological order it is always the last (present) item handed to the change feed process. So when an item is deleted there is no item and, due to implementation, also no event.
Remedy 1: Soft delete the item by marking it as “deleted”. This is a common approach in many a system. A drawback is that the repository will end up with stale data.
Remedy 2: Soft delete the item as above. Then make sure this information has been conveyed (in my case the item should be deleted from the search database) before properly deleting it. This is a more complex solution where the logic still has to handle soft deleted items while also adding the complexity of yet a process to scan(?) the repo for items to delete.
Your turn
I have found no uservoice, github or azurefeedback item for voting on getting a delete event; the closest is an item for getting a event for it in Azurefunctions. In lack of better place I voted there; so can you if you have the need.
Update
I wrote a suggestion of my own here at azurefeedback. I did try to find an existing suggestion but failed. Am I the only one deleting data? Or the guys at Microsoft will find an already existing suggestion where I can move my votes.
Comments about rules I have found but often not followed
“Do not postfix enums with Enum.” To be honest – I have often found it the best solution to postfix with Enum.
“Do not organise namespaces after company hierarchy.” Even though Conway’s law is a thing, a system should not keep the history of a changed organisation chart.
“Do not use List<T> on public methods.” List<T> is a complex beast. But using IEnumerable<T> might have some reiteration performance impact, that is when you have to loop through the same collection twice.
Other comments
“Carefully choose names for your types, methods, and parameters.” Naming things can be hard so take your time and discuss with your colleagues.
“Do not create mutable value types.” I totally agree. It is easier to debug imutable. Often when I track down a but I have only a (bad) call stack and the name of a public method and some source code. Then it is very important the code is easy to follow by hand.
“Do not throw
1
Exception
or
1
SystemException
.” I can count on the fingers on one hand the people, beside me, that bother with writing a proper exception. Visual studio makes it easy, just write ‘exception’ and then tab and you get the full template.
“Members returning arrays should return copies of an internal master array.” I is good OOP practice to not publish internal stuff. Correction, it is cruical OOP practice to not expose the innards of a class.
Other other comments
“Prefer classes over interfaces.” Why? Context please.
IMO the linked article forgot to mention that public methods should not have optional parameters as they are compiled into the caller and not callee.
Avoid public as any change to them might break the API. Unfortunately Visual studio defaults new classes (and methods?) to public so I see them everywhere.
I am currently experimenting with using a virtual machine for my development. I have earlier done it through OSX/Win by the means of Parallells but now I am trying a Win/Win solution with Hyper-V.
Every 30 days or third month, I have seen both, is for how long the license is valid, I do a Hyper-V Manager->Quick create->Windows 10 dev environment and 30 minutes later, or so, the new VM is up and running.
Microsoft packages and delivers the new download on the very day of expiry so it is not possible to download a VM a day before and prep it. It means the VM is out of date the moment you have installed the new one.
But there is a work around, open a console in admin and
1
slmgr –rearm
and you have 90(?) new days. This can only be done once per VM.
Also note that the Hyper-V manager gui, as depicted below, does not refresh its “Create virtual-machine”-content so the date of the template might be old. Restart (the host machine?) to refresh it.
The mandatory screen shot.
It comes with Visual studio, Visual studio code, Powershell 6 and some dotnet preinstalled. All I have to do is start VS and tell it to update itself..
I have checked that all chocolatey packages I reference are “trusted package”. I cannot know if they packages remain “trusted package” at the time you are reading this. The choice is yours.
To make it even cooler one can install more stuff, like oh-my-posh. For it to work one needs a new font “Cascadia Code”, and Windows terminal has to be updated to use it.
I believe Keyboard1337 is a zip if you git clone BecarroInamovible. If so, you don’t have to download Keyboard1337.
Otherwise download
1
Keyboad 1337.zip
. Unblock. Unpack. Install. Run Keyboard 1337\l337\setup.exe (yupp. there’s a typo there) Language preferences -> Keep English(Sweden) and English(United States). The latter is Keyboard1337
If these 3 issues aren’t a problem in you case, be reluctant to use an O/RM as an O/RM brings a bunch of other problems.
Type security
When you get the Customer.Verified out of a database the code already knows it is a boolean. No explicit type casting or declaring is needed as it is done elswhere, once and for all.
Now this isn’t totally true but depends on whether LINQ or HQL (or for another O/RM) you are using. But basically it is true, because of solid Left-right copying
Data copying
Copying data from a recordset to the Entity is done by the OR/M and configured once and for all. Unlike a programmer it won’t forget to copy a field in an obscure corner in your code base.
It isn’t hard to write a data copying function for this simple case and dragging a whole OR/M into the project is a lot of dependencies for little use.
Turn around
When the scheme is changing fast, like in the beginning of a project, or when prototyping, an O/RM is of great help to change in one place and let the coding tools and compiler do the rest of the changes in the project.
Schemes tend to solidify after a while and only change in small increments so speeding up the first 3 months for having a rucksack the coming 6 years might not be the best solution.
